Sebbene il Lucas e l’Autopulse lavorino in modi differenti, con tecniche differenti e con performance differenti, presentano entrambi un elemento comune: l’indiscutibile vantaggio di rendere disponibile un operatore in più esonerandolo dal compito di eseguire il massaggio cardiaco, cosa molto importante considerando che le risorse in una RCP in ambiente extraospedaliero valgono oro. https://www.nursetimes.org/2015/10/compressioni-toraciche-esterne-manuali-vs-compressioni-toraciche-con-dispositiv

automatic CPR machine is LUCAS (Lund University Cardiopulmonary Assist System). Medical device manufacturer Stryker promotes the LUCAS 3, v3.1 chest compression system, highlighting its ability to deliver consistent, high-quality chest compressions. Another automated CPR device is the AutoPulse Resuscitation System from ZOLL Medical, which uses a different method of compression. Here's why these devices are important:Improved CPR Quality:They ensure consistent chest compressions at the correct r